In a major decision, the Telangana High Court has set aside the TGPSC Group-I mains exam results, which were declared on March 10, 2025. The court or
In a major decision, the Telangana High Court has set aside the TGPSC Group-I mains exam results, which were declared on March 10, 2025. The court ordered the commission to either re-evaluate all answer sheets or, if that is not feasible, re-conduct the examination for the 563 vacant posts. This ruling was issued on September 9, 2025, in response to petitions from unsuccessful candidates who alleged widespread irregularities. The TGPSC has been given a strict eight-month deadline to complete the process.
Why the Court Intervened: Key Allegations
The court’s verdict was heavily influenced by several key allegations of procedural lapses and a lack of transparency. The petitioners argued that the evaluation process was fundamentally flawed because the TGPSC did not follow the Supreme Court’s guidelines from the Sanjay Singh vs. UPSC case . Specifically, the court ordered the use of a “moderation method” to ensure consistent and fair marking across all answer scripts.
A central concern was the alleged use of non-Telugu speaking evaluators to correct answer scripts written in the Telugu language, which petitioners claimed negatively affected candidates and resulted in a noticeable discrepancy in pass percentages between English and Telugu medium candidates. Other concerns included the concentration of top scorers from only two exam centers and the lack of a transparent Grand Ranking List .
Exclusive Timeline & Data Summary
- Timeline:
- October 2024: The Group-I mains examination is held for 563 posts.
- March 10, 2025: The TGPSC declares the results of the mains exam.
- March 24, 2025: The High Court issues notices to TGPSC based on initial petitions from aspirants.
- September 9, 2025: The Telangana High Court delivers its landmark verdict, annulling the results.
Table: TGPSC Group-I Controversy at a Glance
| Parameter | Details | Source |
| Vacancies | 563 posts | |
| Candidates Appeared | Over 21,000 (some reports state 30,000) | |
| Result Date | March 10, 2025 | |
| Court Order Date | September 9, 2025 | |
| Court’s Mandate | Re-evaluation using moderation or a fresh exam | |
| Court’s Deadline | Eight months |
What is the ‘moderation method’ of evaluation?
The moderation method is a process used to standardize marks awarded by different examiners, ensuring consistency and fairness. The court mandated this to counter the “examiner variability” cited in the petitions.
Will TGPSC appeal the High Court’s decision?
As of now, TGPSC has not released an official statement regarding an appeal. Aspirants should watch for official communication on the TGPSC website .
Is it certain that the re-exam will be held?
No. The court has given TGPSC a choice: re-evaluate the existing answer sheets or re-conduct the exam. A re-exam will only happen if the re-evaluation is deemed unfeasible.
What is the difference between a General Ranking List (GRL) and the final merit list?
The GRL is a common list of all candidates based on their marks, while the final merit list is a subset of candidates selected for the available vacancies. The court annulled both .
How does this verdict affect other TGPSC exams?
While this verdict is specific to the Group-I mains, it sets a strong precedent for all future TGPSC exams, reinforcing the importance of procedural transparency and fair evaluation .
What’s Next for Aspirants?
The High Court’s ruling means the recruitment process for the 563 posts is on hold. For aspirants, the path forward involves staying vigilant and preparing for either a re-evaluation or a new exam. It is crucial to follow official updates from the TGPSC website to get verified information and avoid rumors .
Conclusion
The Telangana High Court’s verdict provides clarity and a clear path forward for thousands of Group-I aspirants. By nullifying the results and mandating either a fair re-evaluation or a fresh exam, the court has upheld the principles of transparency in public recruitment. Aspirants should remain patient, avoid relying on social media rumors, and continue their preparation for the next phase of this recruitment process.
COMMENTS